Im looking very muck into mobile mapping and think this is a field, we will see much more of, in the future.
I have been checking out a lot of the different solutions and must say, it is a jungle!
All the providers says that you have to pay big bucks, for a mobile mapping solution and is always trying to sell you a system, where you can collect data of a street in two minutes. But is the accuracy and system suiteble for anything else, than highwayscanning?
Does anyone have any pros and cons about the different systems and what accuracy can you espect for a mobile mapping solution?
For what i can find out, Riegel is still the leading provider of mobile mapping solutions, but is also very expensive compared to the leica pegasus 2 system. Does anyone know what the accuracy difference is?
This is an open discustion, so feel free to give your point of view.
Accuracy and system
- ksyen
- I have made 50-60 posts
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2008 2:14 am
- 15
- Full Name: Kin Yen
- Company Details: University of California Davis
- Company Position Title: Development Engineer
- Country: US
- Linkedin Profile: Yes
- Location: Davis, California, USA
- Contact:
Re: Accuracy and system
I have experience with Trimble MX8 and Riegl VMX-1HA. Zero hand on experience with Pegasus. Oregon DOT uses Pegasus 2. The Pegasus 2 can use Z-F scanner or Leica Pxx. I would recommend scanner with 360 degree field of view.
To get "survey grade" particularly the absolute vertical accuracy, you will need ground controls to "adjust" or "register" you scan to local ground controls and targets. How the registration software work is very important. Please note that different organizations has a different definition of "Survey grade" vertical accuracy (some uses 3 cm and some uses 1 cm or less). The density of ground control depends on the vertical accuracy requirement. You will need more controls for GNSS challenged area.
The images from camera on board MX8 and VMX-1HA are disappointing compare the Ladybug5 images. I highly recommend getting Ladybug5 or 5+ camera. FLIR software processing the raw 12bit image gives a much better color and white balance.
The hardware performances are pretty close across different MTLS systems. I would look close into the software and make sure they are compatible to what you trying to produce for you customers.
The following reports are what we developed for our research related to MTLS. Read them if you cannot go to sleep.
http://ahmct.ucdavis.edu/pdf/UCD-ARR-18-02-14-01.pdf
http://ahmct.ucdavis.edu/pdf/UCD-ARR-15-08-28-01.pdf
http://ahmct.ucdavis.edu/pdf/UCD-ARR-14-06-14-01.pdf
http://ahmct.ucdavis.edu/pdf/UCD-ARR-11-09-30-01.pdf
http://ahmct.ucdavis.edu/pdf/UCD-ARR-10-11-30-01.pdf
Best regards,
Kin
To get "survey grade" particularly the absolute vertical accuracy, you will need ground controls to "adjust" or "register" you scan to local ground controls and targets. How the registration software work is very important. Please note that different organizations has a different definition of "Survey grade" vertical accuracy (some uses 3 cm and some uses 1 cm or less). The density of ground control depends on the vertical accuracy requirement. You will need more controls for GNSS challenged area.
The images from camera on board MX8 and VMX-1HA are disappointing compare the Ladybug5 images. I highly recommend getting Ladybug5 or 5+ camera. FLIR software processing the raw 12bit image gives a much better color and white balance.
The hardware performances are pretty close across different MTLS systems. I would look close into the software and make sure they are compatible to what you trying to produce for you customers.
The following reports are what we developed for our research related to MTLS. Read them if you cannot go to sleep.
http://ahmct.ucdavis.edu/pdf/UCD-ARR-18-02-14-01.pdf
http://ahmct.ucdavis.edu/pdf/UCD-ARR-15-08-28-01.pdf
http://ahmct.ucdavis.edu/pdf/UCD-ARR-14-06-14-01.pdf
http://ahmct.ucdavis.edu/pdf/UCD-ARR-11-09-30-01.pdf
http://ahmct.ucdavis.edu/pdf/UCD-ARR-10-11-30-01.pdf
Best regards,
Kin
- gabrio
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2016 6:32 pm
- 8
- Full Name: Gabrio Rossi
- Company Details: Intellegere srl
- Company Position Title: technical director
- Country: Italy
- Linkedin Profile: Yes
- Location: Bergamo - Italy
- Been thanked: 9 times
- Contact:
Re: Accuracy and system
wow Kin, what a valuable present! i need some days off now ^_^
Inviato dal mio iPad utilizzando Tapatalk
Inviato dal mio iPad utilizzando Tapatalk
arch. Gabrio Rossi, MRICS
[email protected]
Passaggio dei Canonici Lateranensi n. 4
24121 Bergamo - Italy
+39.035.601.1492
[email protected]
Passaggio dei Canonici Lateranensi n. 4
24121 Bergamo - Italy
+39.035.601.1492
- sersab
- I have made 80-90 posts
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 11:37 am
- 10
- Full Name: Sergio Sabbatini
- Company Details: 3DScan it
- Company Position Title: CEO
- Country: Italia
- Skype Name: sersab
- Linkedin Profile: Yes
- Location: Milano, Italy
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: Accuracy and system
Two papers that are worth reading.
http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/9/8/796
http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/8/3/401
http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/9/8/796
http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/8/3/401
Sergio Sabbatini
3DScan - 3D Laser Scanning and topography
T +39 039 6980186 | Mail [email protected] | Web http://www.3dscan.it/en/
3DScan - 3D Laser Scanning and topography
T +39 039 6980186 | Mail [email protected] | Web http://www.3dscan.it/en/