Doubtless explains why the circle under the scanner is so large, your 12mm at 1M example suggests it should maybe be somewhat larger still That said, the 12mm measured doesn't look like a normal distance between lines observed from different setups, more like a corner anomaly with possibly some registration error thrown in. Specs have it as 6mm @ 10m in highest accuracy mode and the data seems to bear that out.badam wrote: ↑Wed Jun 22, 2022 2:47 pm well this is not a handheld device so this shouldn't be compared to those.
It should be compared to faro S,M series, previous blk series, or any other TLS device. The blk360 previous version strugled a lot close to the minimum measurment distance which is quite high already. And possibly that is used a lot because of the device agility. Like small interior rooms. And that is where the close range comes in, and also the 270 Vertical field of view which is pretty small for these.
each setup has its own color to distinguish them, but i kept it visible to be able to compare somewhat true wall position.
12mm_at_1m.png
6mm_at2m.png
This makes the data ugly and hard to register correctly, because these spaces usually already hard to register, because of low amount of overlaps. And the vertical range is not helping here.
I think the comparison to the likes of a handheld MMS is a fair one, not so much in terms of technology, more so that these are products aimed at the novice user with emphasis primarily on ease of use. No sure which TLS I'd be looking at in the $20k - $25k price range to compare it with.