B/W targets missing data - I am stumped.
-
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:26 am
- 8
- Full Name: C-Augusto
- Company Details: 3d scanning
- Company Position Title: USA
- Country: US
- Has thanked: 102 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
B/W targets missing data - I am stumped.
Hi everyone,
I can't seem to understand what we are doing wrong here. We can capture targets within 30 ft. This can be 6"-8" paper or tilt turns as shown below.
Anything further than that, the black areas on the targets are missing (some of it is still missing within the 30ft range). But beyond that, there is no black for the white to create a point.
I thought that by increasing from 1/5 to 1/4 we would have better luck but nothing. (see below).
I read on another thread, that to get more range from the scanner we need to increase the quality setting, so from 2X to 3X or 4X ? (This increased scan times drastically just to capture a target)
I then read of folks capturing targets at 30 meters - basically 90-100 ft at 1/4 (they don't say what quality). Our scanner is a 150 S plus. basically a top-of-the-line gun (before the new ones came out).
I can't seem to understand what we are doing wrong here. We can capture targets within 30 ft. This can be 6"-8" paper or tilt turns as shown below.
Anything further than that, the black areas on the targets are missing (some of it is still missing within the 30ft range). But beyond that, there is no black for the white to create a point.
I thought that by increasing from 1/5 to 1/4 we would have better luck but nothing. (see below).
I read on another thread, that to get more range from the scanner we need to increase the quality setting, so from 2X to 3X or 4X ? (This increased scan times drastically just to capture a target)
I then read of folks capturing targets at 30 meters - basically 90-100 ft at 1/4 (they don't say what quality). Our scanner is a 150 S plus. basically a top-of-the-line gun (before the new ones came out).
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
-
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 842
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:32 pm
- 10
- Full Name: Massimo De Marchi
- Company Details: Massimo De Marchi
- Company Position Title: freelancer
- Country: Italy
- Skype Name: massimo_de_marchi
- Has thanked: 15 times
- Been thanked: 51 times
- Contact:
Re: B/W targets missing data - I am stumped.
I have a S120.
My rule of thumb is:
1X -> max range 30m
2x -> max range 60m
3x -> full range (120m)
With very dark surfaces range decreases.
In Faro targets black area is grey. Maybe the black is too dark and the range decreases even further?
Massimo
My rule of thumb is:
1X -> max range 30m
2x -> max range 60m
3x -> full range (120m)
With very dark surfaces range decreases.
In Faro targets black area is grey. Maybe the black is too dark and the range decreases even further?
Massimo
ing. Massimo De Marchi - +39 347 32 17 049 - www.studiodemarchi.net
-
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:26 am
- 8
- Full Name: C-Augusto
- Company Details: 3d scanning
- Company Position Title: USA
- Country: US
- Has thanked: 102 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
Re: B/W targets missing data - I am stumped.
What resolution do you use? What type of targets are you using.
The grey makes sense since FARO is different technology than leica, but support hasn't really recommended that as a solution. Make sense and I am eager to try it.
What targets do you use ?
The grey makes sense since FARO is different technology than leica, but support hasn't really recommended that as a solution. Make sense and I am eager to try it.
What targets do you use ?
- landmeterbeuckx
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 1503
- Joined: Tue May 01, 2012 5:19 pm
- 11
- Full Name: Lieven Beuckx
- Company Details: Studiebureau Beuckx
- Company Position Title: Owner
- Country: Belgium
- Linkedin Profile: Yes
- Has thanked: 159 times
- Been thanked: 478 times
Re: B/W targets missing data - I am stumped.
Aren't these Leica targets smaller than a faro target on an a4 sheet? Maybe that's the cause.Augusto 3D wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2023 12:04 am What resolution do you use? What type of targets are you using.
The grey makes sense since FARO is different technology than leica, but support hasn't really recommended that as a solution. Make sense and I am eager to try it.
What targets do you use ?
I would reference with spheres and define the center with a corresponding prism setup.
Prisms like on this page https://shop.laserscanning-europe.com/A ... or-targets
- Leandre Robitaille
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Sat Aug 03, 2019 1:53 am
- 4
- Full Name: Leandre Robitaille
- Company Details: Cima+
- Company Position Title: Civil Technician - Surveyor
- Country: Canada
- Has thanked: 59 times
- Been thanked: 207 times
Re: B/W targets missing data - I am stumped.
I use a leica checkerboard with faro all the time with my bipod for pk nails. General rule is that the intensity values on them are horrible and you can never scan them with 1/4 setting. You could be 3m away from the checkerboard and detection probably will not work. For me only way to consistently detect them is to do a 1/2 scan and be within 9m of the leica checkerboard.
-
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:26 am
- 8
- Full Name: C-Augusto
- Company Details: 3d scanning
- Company Position Title: USA
- Country: US
- Has thanked: 102 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
Re: B/W targets missing data - I am stumped.
That is pretty consistent with what I am finding with ALL types if targets. 9 meters / 30 FT. Higher resolution and extra quality. I need to get my hands on the gray/white version of those leica targets.
-
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:26 am
- 8
- Full Name: C-Augusto
- Company Details: 3d scanning
- Company Position Title: USA
- Country: US
- Has thanked: 102 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
Re: B/W targets missing data - I am stumped.
I wanted to follow up your post with the following question. I wonder if Faro and possible Z&F have this issue and having someting to do with phase based? We had an X7 and even with a BLK we did not have this challenge. I wonder what target Z&F recommend.Leandre Robitaille wrote: ↑Thu Sep 07, 2023 10:09 pm I use a leica checkerboard with faro all the time with my bipod for pk nails. General rule is that the intensity values on them are horrible and you can never scan them with 1/4 setting. You could be 3m away from the checkerboard and detection probably will not work. For me only way to consistently detect them is to do a 1/2 scan and be within 9m of the leica checkerboard.
-
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:26 am
- 8
- Full Name: C-Augusto
- Company Details: 3d scanning
- Company Position Title: USA
- Country: US
- Has thanked: 102 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
Re: B/W targets missing data - I am stumped.
I emailed support and as usual not very helpful. Instead, they referred me to the help manual lol.
I am still waiting for a response from them on wether gray is better to order new targets.
I am still waiting for a response from them on wether gray is better to order new targets.
- LPaulCook
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 9:42 pm
- 8
- Full Name: L Paul Cook
- Company Details: Land surveyor doing LiDAR
- Company Position Title: President
- Country: United States
- Linkedin Profile: Yes
- Location: Santa Barbara CA
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 39 times
- Contact:
Re: B/W targets missing data - I am stumped.
I print my own targets using black and white, not grey, on my old laser printer.
I use 1/4 Q1 settings outside typically and pick up good details well over 100'.
I'm using both a X330 and S350 FARO FOCUS scanners.
I have had 36"x48" targets printed on pvc 1/4" thick boards by FEDEX and got good readings over 600' away using full density Q1 settings. Checked my surveyed coordinates within 0.06' which was plenty good for the job at hand.
I use 1/4 Q1 settings outside typically and pick up good details well over 100'.
I'm using both a X330 and S350 FARO FOCUS scanners.
I have had 36"x48" targets printed on pvc 1/4" thick boards by FEDEX and got good readings over 600' away using full density Q1 settings. Checked my surveyed coordinates within 0.06' which was plenty good for the job at hand.
L. Paul Cook, PLS
www.LPC3D.com
www.LPC3D.com
-
- V.I.P Member
- Posts: 409
- Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:26 am
- 8
- Full Name: C-Augusto
- Company Details: 3d scanning
- Company Position Title: USA
- Country: US
- Has thanked: 102 times
- Been thanked: 24 times
Re: B/W targets missing data - I am stumped.
Are these target you are getting well beyond 100' checkerboards printed on 8.5x11 ?LPaulCook wrote: ↑Mon Sep 18, 2023 12:19 am I print my own targets using black and white, not grey, on my old laser printer.
I use 1/4 Q1 settings outside typically and pick up good details well over 100'.
I'm using both a X330 and S350 FARO FOCUS scanners.
I have had 36"x48" targets printed on pvc 1/4" thick boards by FEDEX and got good readings over 600' away using full density Q1 settings. Checked my surveyed coordinates within 0.06' which was plenty good for the job at hand.