Case Study: Accuracy of PX-80 Point Clouds vs Handheld Laser Measurements

BLK2GO, KAARTA, GeoSLAM, Gexcel HERON MS Twin, NavVis VLX, PARACOSM and SurphSLAM
Post Reply
julie matheney
I have made <0 posts
I have made <0 posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2017 2:15 pm
7
Full Name: Julie Matheney
Company Details: Paracosm
Company Position Title: Head of Marketing
Country: USA
Linkedin Profile: No

Case Study: Accuracy of PX-80 Point Clouds vs Handheld Laser Measurements

Post by julie matheney »

VXGrid
V.I.P Member
V.I.P Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2017 10:47 am
7
Full Name: Martin Graner
Company Details: PointCab GmbH
Company Position Title: Research and Development
Country: Germany
Linkedin Profile: No
Has thanked: 160 times
Been thanked: 175 times
Contact:

Re: Case Study: Accuracy of PX-80 Point Clouds vs Handheld Laser Measurements

Post by VXGrid »

julie matheney wrote: Tue Aug 06, 2019 5:37 pm https://bdge.me/2OHxpSC
Do you have absolut numbers for the measurements as well (like measuring the points with a laser tracker)?
I only saw deviations between both systems, no information which was more accurate. Would be very interesting to see these results!
Post Reply

Return to “Dynamic Mapping Scanners”